[HTML][HTML] Metabolic and behavioral compensations in response to caloric restriction: implications for the maintenance of weight loss

LM Redman, LK Heilbronn, CK Martin, L De Jonge… - PloS one, 2009 - journals.plos.org
LM Redman, LK Heilbronn, CK Martin, L De Jonge, DA Williamson, JP Delany, E Ravussin
PloS one, 2009journals.plos.org
Background Metabolic and behavioral adaptations to caloric restriction (CR) in free-living
conditions have not yet been objectively measured. Methodology and Principal Findings
Forty-eight (36.8±1.0 y), overweight (BMI 27.8±0.7 kg/m2) participants were randomized to
four groups for 6-months; Control: energy intake at 100% of energy requirements; CR: 25%
calorie restriction; CR+ EX: 12.5% CR plus 12.5% increase in energy expenditure by
structured exercise; LCD: low calorie diet (890 kcal/d) until 15% weight reduction followed …
Background
Metabolic and behavioral adaptations to caloric restriction (CR) in free-living conditions have not yet been objectively measured.
Methodology and Principal Findings
Forty-eight (36.8±1.0 y), overweight (BMI 27.8±0.7 kg/m2) participants were randomized to four groups for 6-months; Control: energy intake at 100% of energy requirements; CR: 25% calorie restriction; CR+EX: 12.5% CR plus 12.5% increase in energy expenditure by structured exercise; LCD: low calorie diet (890 kcal/d) until 15% weight reduction followed by weight maintenance. Body composition (DXA) and total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) over 14-days by doubly labeled water (DLW) and activity related energy activity (AREE) were measured after 3 (M3) and 6 (M6) months of intervention. Weight changes at M6 were −1.0±1.1% (Control), −10.4±0.9% (CR), −10.0±0.8% (CR+EX) and −13.9±0.8% (LCD). At M3, absolute TDEE was significantly reduced in CR (−454±76 kcal/d) and LCD (−633±66 kcal/d) but not in CR+EX or controls. At M6 the reduction in TDEE remained lower than baseline in CR (−316±118 kcal/d) and LCD (−389±124 kcal/d) but reached significance only when CR and LCD were combined (−351±83 kcal/d). In response to caloric restriction (CR/LCD combined), TDEE adjusted for body composition, was significantly lower by −431±51 and −240±83 kcal/d at M3 and M6, respectively, indicating a metabolic adaptation. Likewise, physical activity (TDEE adjusted for sleeping metabolic rate) was significantly reduced from baseline at both time points. For control and CR+EX, adjusted TDEE (body composition or sleeping metabolic rate) was not changed at either M3 or M6.
Conclusions
For the first time we show that in free-living conditions, CR results in a metabolic adaptation and a behavioral adaptation with decreased physical activity levels. These data also suggest potential mechanisms by which CR causes large inter-individual variability in the rates of weight loss and how exercise may influence weight loss and weight loss maintenance.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00099151
PLOS